1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 856 F.Supp.
  5. 856 F.Supp. 88 (1994)
 

FIELD v. KIRTON

Civ. No. 3:93-1684 (JAC).

856 F.Supp. 88 (1994)

Arthur FIELD v. Lila KIRTON.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 21, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Field, pro se.

Edward P. McCreery, III, Andrew J. McDonald, Pullman & Comley, Bridgeport, CT, for defendant.

RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Chief Judge:

The plaintiff, a Connecticut attorney, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and supplemental (or pendent) state law claims against an Assistant Attorney General of the State of New York. Pending before the court are the defendant's motion for summary judgment and the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases