1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 873 F.Supp.
  5. 873 F.Supp. 57 (1994)
 

UAW v. LORAL CORP.

No. 5:92 CV 2391.

873 F.Supp. 57 (1994)

INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LORAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

April 20, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Betty E. Grdina, Bobulsky & Grdina, Ashtabula, OH, for plaintiffs.

Edward C. Kaminski, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, Akron, OH, Carol MacKenzie, Alan Pearl, Pearl & MacKenzie, Westbury, L.I., NY, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

Before the Court are three motions for summary judgment: 1) plaintiffs' motion (Docket No. 46); 2) defendant Loral Corporation's motion (Docket No. 61); and 3) the combined motion of defendants Aircraft Braking System Corporation and K & F Industries (Docket No. 62). Supporting and opposing memorandums have been filed for each motion. For the reasons discussed below, each motion is granted in part and denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases