TROPIX, INC. v. LUMIGEN, INC.

Civ. A. No. 92-11000-WJS.

851 F.Supp. 25 (1994)

TROPIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. LUMIGEN, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

May 13, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. O'Konski, Steven J. Frank, Michael E. Attaya, Cesari & McKenna, Boston, MA, Steven B. Kelber, Charles L. Gholz, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.D., Arlington, VA, T. Christopher Donnelly, Donnelly, Conroy & Gelhaar, Boston, MA, for plaintiff.

William F. Lee, Mark G. Matuschak, William F. Lee, Hale & Dorr, Boston, MA, Mark Boland, J. Frank Osha, Sughrue, Mion, Zinn, Macpeak & Seas, Washington, DC, for defendant.


ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF PATENT NO. 4,931,569

SKINNER, Senior District Judge.

In this action, the plaintiff seeks damages and injunctive relief for the alleged infringement of its U.S. Patent No. 4,931,569 (the "569" patent). The defendant moves for summary judgment of non-infringement. The plaintiff has offered no evidence of literal infringement; accordingly, partial summary judgment for the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases