1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 511 U.S.
  5. 511 U.S. 318 (1994)
 

STANSBURY v. CALIFORNIA

No. 93-5770.

511 U.S. 318 (1994)

114 S.Ct. 1526

128 L.Ed.2d 293

STANSBURY v. CALIFORNIA

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 26, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Westberg, by appointment of the Court, 510 U.S. 1009, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were David S. Winton and Joseph A. Hearst.

Aileen Bunney, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Ronald A. Bass, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald E. Niver, Deputy Attorney General.*

Per Curiam.

This case concerns the rules for determining whether a person being questioned by law enforcement officers is held in custody, and thus entitled to the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 (1966). We hold, not for the first time, that an officer's subjective and undisclosed view concerning whether the person being interrogated is a suspect is irrelevant to the assessment whether the person...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases