1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 179 Ariz.
  5. 179 Ariz. 589 (1994)
 

LASLEY v. HELMS

No. 1 CA-CV 93-0182.

179 Ariz. 589 (1994)

880 P.2d 1135

George LASLEY and Velma Lasley, husband and wife, and individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Rebecca Lasley Dunning, Mark Lasley and Meredith Lasley, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants, v. William K. HELMS, M.D., Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

Review Denied October 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Broening Oberg & Woods, P.C. by James R. Broening, Cynthia V. Cheney, Martha M. Burns, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Roush, McCracken & Guerrero by Charles D. Roush, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-intervenors-appellants.

O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, P.A. by Harding B. Cure, Christopher Robbins, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee.

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

The plaintiffs, George and Velma Lasley, George Lasley's children, and his former wife, appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, William K. Helms, M.D., and the trial court's denial of their motion for new trial, both of which were based on the trial court's finding that their claims were barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases