1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 515 N.W.2d
  5. 515 N.W.2d 226 (1994)
 

PETERSEN v. HINKY DINKY

No. 18281.

515 N.W.2d 226 (1994)

David D. PETERSEN, Claimant and Appellant, v. HINKY DINKY, Employer and Appellee, and INA/CIGNA, Insurer and Appellee.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided April 20, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott G. Hoy of Hoy Law Office, Sioux Falls, for claimant and appellant.

Comet Haraldson of Woods, Fuller, Schultz & Smith, Sioux Falls, for appellees.

LOVRIEN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by David D. Petersen (Petersen) from a judgment of the circuit court wherein it affirmed a decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Division of Labor and Management (Department), in favor of Hinky Dinky (Employer) and its worker's compensation carrier, INA/CIGNA (Insurer), denying Petersen's claim for a permanent total disability rating under the odd-lot doctrine. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Petersen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases