1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 279 N.J.
  5. 279 N.J. Super. 207 (1994)
 

PRICE CO. v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

279 N.J. Super. 207 (1994)

652 A.2d 723

THE PRICE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF UNION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fahey & Fahey, attorneys for appellant (Brian W. Fahey, on the brief).

Woliansky & Doyle, attorneys for respondent (Marc A. Woliansky, on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, DREIER and VILLANUEVA.

PER CURIAM.

In this municipal land use case, the substantial issue raised is whether a local zoning board of adjustment may consider off-site traffic conditions in determining whether an applicant for a use variance has satisfied the negative criteria required by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70. The Law Division upheld the decision of the local zoning board of adjustment denying the use variance and six bulk variances essentially because of off-site traffic conditions....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases