1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 138 N.J.
  5. 138 N.J. 242 (1994)
 

LINDSTROM v. HANOVER INS. CO.

138 N.J. 242 (1994)

649 A.2d 1272

KURT LINDSTROM, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GEORGE K. LINDSTROM, AND GEORGE K. LINDSTROM, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY ON BEHALF OF THE NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia D. Connelly argued the cause for appellant (Shebell & Schibell, attorneys; Peter Shebell, Jr., of counsel).

Mark S. Hochman argued the cause for respondent (Gertler & Hanna, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.

Plaintiff Kurt Lindstrom sustained grave injuries resulting from a gunshot wound inflicted in a drive-by shooting. He seeks recovery of personal-injury-protection (PIP) benefits under his father's automobile insurance policy, issued by defendant. The trial court concluded that the nexus between the injury and the automobile was not substantial enough to bring the loss within PIP coverage, and therefore it entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases