1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 137 N.J.
  5. 137 N.J. 216 (1994)
 

PIZZO MANTIN GROUP v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH

137 N.J. 216 (1994)

645 A.2d 89

PIZZO MANTIN GROUP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Buzak argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents (Mr. Buzak, attorney; Mr. Buzak and Robert B. Campbell, on the briefs).

Douglas R. Henshaw argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Henshaw & Brady, attorneys; Mr. Henshaw and Rosella E. Nichay, on the brief).

Susan R. Kaplan submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of amicus curiae, New Jersey Builders Ass'n (Hutt & Berkow, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

This case concerns the scope of the authority of municipal planning boards over subdivisions under the Municipal Land Use Law. The proposed subdivision relates to a large tract located in an environmentally-sensitive area. The appeal raises the issue of whether municipal planning boards, in deciding whether to grant an application for a preliminary major subdivision that otherwise complies with the municipal subdivision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases