CITY OF EL MONTE v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B084361.

29 Cal.App.4th 272 (1994)

34 Cal. Rptr.2d 490

CITY OF EL MONTE et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; RUDY LEE BULLEN, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

October 14, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

James Francis Wilson for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

R. Samuel Paz, David A. Xavier and Francisco A. Suarez for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

ARMSTRONG, J.

In this original proceeding, we hold that when a plaintiff obtains a verdict entitling him to punitive damages, but allows the jury to be discharged without presenting evidence relevant to the amount of punitive damages, the court may not "reconvene another jury" to consider that evidence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The relevant facts necessary to this opinion, briefly stated, are as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases