1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 876 F.Supp.
  5. 876 F.Supp. 1474 (1994)
 

LUST v. BURKE

Civ. No. H-93-40.

876 F.Supp. 1474 (1994)

Regina LUST, et al. Plaintiffs v. Michael BURKE, et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

February 16, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Jay Hyman, Damascus, MD, for plaintiffs.

Ralph Gordon, Edmund Law and Gordon & Simmons, Frederick, MD, for defendant Burke.

Stephen Field, pro se.

Keith A. Rosenberg, Morton A. Faller, and Meyer, Faller, Weisman & Rosenberg Washington, DC, for defendant Matese.

Michael R. Goodstein and Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott, Washington, DC, for David DeSanto.

Gregory D. Haight and Haight, Tramonte, Sicillano & Flask, Vienna, VA, for defendants Dorothy and Stephen DeSanto.

Peter D. Greenspun, Fairfax, VA, for defendant Naftal.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, Senior District Judge.

This civil action was filed in this Court on January 5, 1993. Suit was brought by 60 named plaintiffs against 14 named defendants, including an accounting firm and a law firm. Count I of the complaint alleged that each of the defendants had violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962, et seq. Count II alleged a violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases