1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 135 N.J.
  5. 135 N.J. 98 (1994)
 

MATTER OF HOERST

135 N.J. 98 (1994)

638 A.2d 801

IN THE MATTER OF FRANK J. HOERST, III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Englehardt, Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Edward N. Fitzpatrick, argued the cause for respondent (Clapp & Eisenberg, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) brought a motion before the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board), seeking final discipline based on respondent's criminal conviction. See Rule 1:20-6(c)(2)(i). The DRB recommended that this Court impose a public reprimand, with two members voting to recommend a six-month suspension. Our independent review of the record leads to the conclusion that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases