1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 854 F.Supp.
  5. 854 F.Supp. 1201 (1994)
 

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. v. ROHM AND HAAS CO.

Civ. A. No. 92-5394.

854 F.Supp. 1201 (1994)

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

June 6, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David P. Bruton, Bonnie Allyn Barnett, Drinker, Biddle & Reath, Philadelphia, PA, for SmithKline Beecham Corp.

Philip J. Katauskas, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, PA, for Rohm and Haas Co.

Frank M. Thomas, Jr., Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, PA, for Buckeye Pipe Line Co.

MEMORANDUM

YOHN, District Judge.

This is an action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq. Plaintiff, SmithKline Beecham ("SKB") and defendant, Rohm and Haas Company ("R & H"), entered into a consent decree with the United States in which both parties agreed to jointly undertake at their own expense to clean up an environmentally contaminated site. Both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases