1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 860 F.Supp.
  5. 860 F.Supp. 1170 (1994)
 

GRAEF v. CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES

No. 1:94-CV 0216.

860 F.Supp. 1170 (1994)

James L GRAEF and John P McClain, Plaintiffs, v. CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, et al, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division.

August 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Fritz Barnett, Glickman & Barnett, Houston, for plaintiffs.

V. Scott Kneese, Elizabeth Hall, Bracewell & Patterson, Houston, J. Anthony Messina, Raymond A. Kresge, Pepper Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, PA, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND

COBB, District Judge.

Defendants removed this case asserting federal question jurisdiction arising out of the preemptive force of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA). Plaintiffs have moved to remand asserting that the LMRA does not preempt their state law causes of action. For the following reasons, the motion to remand is DENIED.

I. FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases