1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 870 F.Supp.
  5. 870 F.Supp. 1140 (1994)
 

U.S. v. EDMONDS

Crim. No. 90-393-04 (CRR).

870 F.Supp. 1140 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America v. Rodger EDMONDS, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

December 15, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rachel Adelman Pierson, Asst. U.S. Atty., along with Eric Holder, Jr., U.S. Atty., and John M. Facciola, Asst. U.S. Atty., for Government.

Peter M. Brody and James M. Lichtman, of Ropes & Gray, Washington, DC, for defendant.

Rodger Edmonds, pro se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is the Defendant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, along with the Defendant's First, Second, and Third Supplemental Memoranda in Support thereof.1 The Defendant, through counsel, raises two claims which he asserts entitle him to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases