1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 865 F.Supp.
  5. 865 F.Supp. 1073 (1994)
 

ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS INC. v. MILES INC.

No. 90 Civ. 5043 (WCC).

865 F.Supp. 1073 (1994)

ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS INC., Plaintiff, v. MILES INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 21, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil, Blaustein & Judlowe, New York City (William G. Todd, Porter F. Fleming, Michael F. Hurley, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott, Chicago, IL (Fred H. Bartlit, Jr., Mark E. Ferguson, David Berten, of counsel), and Sprung, Horn, Kramer & Woods, Tarrytown, NY (Arnold Sprung, Nathaniel D. Kramer, Ira J. Schaefer, of counsel), for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge:

Plaintiff Ortho has moved for judgment as a matter of law or alternatively for a new trial in this action charging infringement by defendant Miles of two patents owned by plaintiff and covering apparatus and methods for photoanalysis of small particles such as blood cells entrained in a thin, rapidly flowing stream of liquid. The action was tried before a jury beginning July 5, 1994. On July...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases