1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 845 F.Supp.
  5. 845 F.Supp. 1041 (1994)
 

U.S. v. WRIGHT

Crim. A. No. 91-385.

845 F.Supp. 1041 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Neal WRIGHT and Dost Mahadik, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

February 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles B. McKenna, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, NJ, for U.S.

Michael V. Gilberti, Budd Larner Rosenbaum Greenberg & Sade, P.C., Short Hills, NJ, for defendants.

OPINION

LECHNER, District Judge.

After a jury trial, defendant Neal Wright ("Wright") was convicted on both counts of a two count indictment. Currently before the court is Wright's motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(c) or, in the alternative, for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. Also before the court is Wright's motion for resentencing pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(c).1 For the reasons set ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases