1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 870 F.Supp.
  5. 870 F.Supp. 1005 (1994)
 

SPRUCE OIL CORP. v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO.

No. 92-C-1071.

870 F.Supp. 1005 (1994)

SPRUCE OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

December 9, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Paul Slivka, Vinton, Slivka & Panasci, Gilbert R. Egle, Elrod, Katz, Preeo, Look, Moison & Silverman, Denver, CO, for plaintiff.

John D. Shively, Daniel F. Warden, Faegre & Benson, Denver, CO, John D. French, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CARRIGAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Spruce Oil Corporation (Spruce), a Colorado corporation with its principal place of business in Arkansas, commenced this action against Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Illinois, asserting antitrust claims under section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2 (first claim) and its state law equivalent, Colo.Rev.Stat. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases