1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 883 P.2d
  5. 883 P.2d 875 (1994)
 

MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO. v. KEY

93C11582; CA A82522.

883 P.2d 875 (1994)

131 Or. App. 130

MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Respondent, v. Veryl KEY and Dale W. Key, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 26, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander, McCann & Smith, P.C.

William G. Earle, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hallmark, Keating & Abbott, P.C.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

LEESON, Judge.

Defendants appeal from a summary judgment for plaintiff that declared the maximum amount of underinsured motorist benefits potentially available to defendants under a policy issued by plaintiff. We affirm.

Defendants, Veryl and Dale Key, were seriously injured in an automobile collision. The tortfeasor's insurance policy had liability limits of $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident. Defendants' insurance policy, issued by plaintiff,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases