1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 862 F.Supp.
  5. 862 F.Supp. 834 (1994)
 

U.S. v. FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS

No. 93-CR-1261 (TCP).

862 F.Supp. 834 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, v. FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

September 8, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zachary W. Carter, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Brooklyn, NY (Peter J. Tomao and Charles D. Kleinberg, Asst. U.S. Attys., of counsel).

Charles A. Stillman and Peter Chavkin, Stillman, Friedman & Shaw, New York City, for defendant Frequency Electronics.

Herald Price Fahringer, Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria, New York City, for defendant Martin Bloch.

Elkan Abramowitz, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason & Silberberg, P.C., New York City, for defendant Abraham Lazar.

Michael Rosen, New York City, for defendant Harry Newman.

Robert L. Ellis, New York City, for defendant Marvin Norworth.

PLATT, Chief Judge.

Defendants have made a voluminous omnibus motion proffering a potpourri of theories mandating the dismissal of part or all of this criminal indictment. The first set of moving papers was addressed to the original indictment. The government superseded that indictment. Defendants then submitted a revised set of motion papers addressed to the superseding indictment. The points raised in both sets of papers that are not moot shall be decided herein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases