GILLETTE, Justice.
In this criminal case, we are faced with the limited question of the appellate reviewability of a criminal sentence. Defendant argued to the Court of Appeals that the trial judge improperly applied the state sentencing guidelines to his offenses. Defendant then argued that, due to this allegedly improper application of the sentencing guidelines, the Court of Appeals had authority to review the sentence under ORS 138.222(4)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.