1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 70 Ohio
  5. 70 Ohio St.3d 94 (1994)
 

STATE EX REL. HILLYER v. TUSCARAWAS CTY. BD. OF COMMRS.

Nos. 93-473 and 93-634.

70 Ohio St.3d 94 (1994)

THE STATE EX REL. HILLYER, JUDGE, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. TUSCARAWAS CTY. BD. OF COMMRS. ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 24, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Stephenson and James M. Carrothers, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Syler, Redinger, Traver & Fox and Thomas W. Fox, for appellants and cross-appellees.

Per Curiam.

Appellants' propositions of law attack the court of appeals' issuance of a writ of mandamus on the claims of Judge Hillyer for (1) attorney fees, (2) suitable court facilities, and (3) appropriation of funds for probation officer. In his cross-appeal, Judge Hillyer asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying his claims for a writ of mandamus for (1) appropriation of budget requests for the county court, and (2) prevention of the board's interference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases