1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 872 F.Supp.
  5. 872 F.Supp. 716 (1994)
 

ATHLETIC ALTERNATIVES, INC. v. PRINCE MFG., INC.

Nos. CIV-92-176-PHX-RGS, CIV-93-765-PHX-RGS.

872 F.Supp. 716 (1994)

ATHLETIC ALTERNATIVES, INC., Plaintiff, v. PRINCE MANUFACTURING, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

June 26, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven D. Copple, Scott E. Boehm, Robert S. Murphy, Copple Chamberlin & Boehm P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for Athletic Alternatives, Inc.

Stephen M. Dichter, Mark I. Harrison, George Vice, III, Bryan Cave McPheeters & McRoberts, Phoenix, AZ, Robert B. Smith, Richard A. Weiss, Cecilia O'Brien Lofters, White & Case, New York City, for Prince Manufacturing, Inc.

ORDER

STRAND, District Judge.

Background

Plaintiff, Athletic Alternatives, Inc., brought this patent infringement action alleging that the Prince Vortex tennis racquet infringes on Plaintiff's patented string system.1 Plaintiff designs athletic products, including string systems for tennis rackets. Defendant, Prince Manufacturing, Inc., manufactures and distributes tennis rackets. In February of 1990, the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases