RUCINSKY v. HENTCHEL

No. 94-153.

881 P.2d 616 (1994)

Elizabeth Anne RUCINSKY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Raymond A. HENTCHEL, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided September 15, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Morrison, Morrison Law Firm, Havre, for appellant.

Robert J. Vermillion, Smith, Walsh, Clarke & Gregoire, Great Falls, for respondent.


HARRISON, Justice.

Elizabeth Ann Rucinsky (Rucinsky) appeals the order of the Twelfth Judicial District Court, Hill County, dismissing her invasion of privacy action pursuant to § 27-2-204, MCA. We affirm.

The sole issue presented is whether the District Court erred in granting Raymond Hentchel's (Hentchel) motion for summary judgment on the basis that the applicable three-year statute of limitations period began to run in 1988, rather than 1992, thereby...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases