1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 868 F.Supp.
  5. 868 F.Supp. 625 (1994)
 

LUCE v. LLOYD'S OF LONDON

Civ. A. No. 5:94-311.

868 F.Supp. 625 (1994)

William A. LUCE and Marie Luce v. LLOYD'S OF LONDON.

United States District Court, D. Vermont.

November 21, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas W. Costello, Brattleboro, VT, for plaintiffs.

Charles Platto, Brooks, McNally, Whittington, Platto & Vitt, Norwich, VT, Jonathan Dryer, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Philadelphia, PA, for defendant.

ORDER

BILLINGS, Senior District Judge.

On November 4, 1994, Plaintiffs William A. Luce and Marie Luce motioned to remand this action to Windham County, Vermont Superior Court. Plaintiffs claim that remand is required because the untimely filing of the Notice of Removal rendered improper the removal of the case from state to federal court. Defendant has objected to the Motion to Remand, claiming that any delay in filing the removal notice was caused...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases