1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 840 F.Supp.
  5. 840 F.Supp. 480 (1994)
 

HAGEN v. HOWMET CORP.

Nos. 1:93-CV-234, 1:93-CV-199.

840 F.Supp. 480 (1994)

Thomas HAGEN, Plaintiff, v. HOWMET CORPORATION, Defendant. Jack STURTEVANT, Plaintiff, v. HOWMET CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D.

January 3, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy J. Bott, Bott & Spencer, PC, Muskegon, MI, for Hagen.

David A. Rhem, Paul M. Kara, Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett, Grand Rapids, MI, for Howmet Corp. in No. 1:93-CV-234.

Timothy J. Bott, Richard D. McCormick, Bott & Spencer, PC, Muskegon, MI, for Sturtevant.

David A. Rhem, Paul M. Kara, Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett, Grand Rapids, MI, for Howmet Corp. and Kline in No. 1:93-CV-199.

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

Thomas Hagen and Jack Sturtevant, the plaintiffs in these two consolidated cases, claim that defendant Howmet Corporation (Howmet) wrongfully terminated their employment and discriminated against them based upon their age. This matter is before the Court on defendant's motions for summary judgment against each plaintiff.

Statement of Facts

Howmet Corporation has a high technology foundry operation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases