1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 872 P.2d
  5. 872 P.2d 433 (1994)
 

HOPKINS v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

CA A80229.

872 P.2d 433 (1994)

127 Or. App. 210

James Scott HOPKINS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 13, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Scott Hopkins filed the brief pro se.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Stephanie S. Andrus, Asst. Atty. Gen., filed the brief for respondent.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks a "declaratory ruling binding between the agency and petitioner for retroactive application of" OAR 291-97-020(7).1 His claim would appear to be based on ORS 183.410, which provides for binding agency rulings as to the applicability of an agency rule to a state of facts. Although an agency's ruling made under that statute is subject to review in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases