1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 870 F.Supp.
  5. 870 F.Supp. 427 (1994)
 

ARROW FASTENER CO., INC. v. STANLEY WORKS

Civ. No. 2:91CV00981 (PCD).

870 F.Supp. 427 (1994)

ARROW FASTENER CO., INC. v. The STANLEY WORKS.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

September 14, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Bright, Jr., Cummings & Lockwood, Hartford, CT, John J. Cotter, Cotter, Cotter & Sohon, Bridgeport, CT, Pasquale A. Razzano, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York City, for plaintiff.

Benjamin A. Solnit, Noble Francis Allen, Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, New Haven, CT, Siegrun Kane, David H.T. Kane, Kane, Dalsimer, Sullivan, Kurucz, Levy, Eisele & Richard, New York City, Carter LaPrade, Madison, CT, Richard F. Orr, Office of the Speaker, Hartford, CT, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

DORSEY, Chief Judge.

Arrow claims a registered trademark in "T-50" after November 14, 1989 and a common law trademark therein from the 1950's. It alleges Stanley's violation of its statutory, 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and 1125(a), and common law right in T-50 and unfair trade practices under Conn.Gen.Stat. §§ 42-110a et seq. Stanley claims that T-50 is a model number in which Arrow has no rights, that there is no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases