1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 841 F.Supp.
  5. 841 F.Supp. 444 (1994)
 

DOE v. ROE

Civ. A. No. 91-1403.

841 F.Supp. 444 (1994)

Jane DOE, Plaintiff, v. Richard ROE, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 10, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elaine C. Bredehoft, John M. Bredehoft, Charlson & Bredehoft, Fairfax, VA, for plaintiff.

Jeffrey Harris, Walter E. Diercks, Rubin, Winston, Diercks, Harris and Cooke, Washington, DC, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

John H. PRATT, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover for injuries allegedly resulting from the tortious communication of a sexually transmissible disease. Currently before us is defendant's motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Fed.R.Civ.P.) 56. This Court, sitting by diversity, is required to apply the choice of law rules of the District of Columbia. The sole issue for purposes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases