1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 849 F.Supp.
  5. 849 F.Supp. 394 (1994)
 

LACEY v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO.

Civ. A. No. 87-1506.

849 F.Supp. 394 (1994)

Graeme Macarthur LACEY, Plaintiff, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, a corporation; Hanlon & Wilson Company, a corporation; Teledyne, Inc., a corporation; and John Does 1-10, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

April 15, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Louik, Berger, Kapetan, Malakoff & Meyers, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for plaintiff.

Donald W. Bebenek, Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, Pittsburgh, PA, for defendants Cessna and Teledyne Inc.

Robert L. Potter, Strassburger, McKenna, Gutnick & Potter, Pittsburgh, PA, for defendant Hanlon & Wilson.

OPINION

COHILL, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens (Doc. 95) filed by defendant Cessna Aircraft Co. Defendants Teledyne, Inc. and Hanlon & Wilson Co. filed their own motions to dismiss (Docs. 102 and 103, respectively), wherein they joined Cessna's motion. For the reasons below, we will deny the motions to dismiss.

I. RELEVANT FACTS AND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases