1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 860 F.Supp.
  5. 860 F.Supp. 375 (1994)
 

McDONALD v. U.S.

Civ. A. No. H-93-1143.

860 F.Supp. 375 (1994)

Earl J. McDONALD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

August 10, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry E. Jacobs, Houston, TX, for plaintiff.

Dinah L. Bundy, Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Dallas, TX, for defendant.

OPINION ON JUDGMENT

HUGHES, District Judge.

1. Introduction.

The McDonalds claim a refund from the Internal Revenue Service because the IRS failed to assess the tax within the three-year statute of limitations. While the procedure followed by the IRS and the tax court in resolving this tax dispute was less than ideal, the government did comply with the law in tolling limitations, and the assessment was made on time.

2. Facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases