1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 866 F.Supp.
  5. 866 F.Supp. 362 (1994)
 

C.R. BARD, INC. v. M3 SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 93 C 4788.

866 F.Supp. 362 (1994)

C.R. BARD, INC., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, v. M3 SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Counterclaimant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

August 24, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry M. Grimm, Timothy J. Rivelli, Thomas J. Wiegan, Timothy P. O'Connor, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, IL, James F. Sweeney, Donovan, Parry, Walsh and Reppto, Desiree M. Stahl, Steven F. Meyer, James W. Gould, Scott B. Howard, Walter G. Hanchuk, Warren H. Rotert, Mark L. Hogge, Morgan & Finnegan, New York City, for plaintiff.

Paul E. Slater, Greg Shinall, Sperline, Slater & Spitz, P.C., Richard D. Harris, Max Shaftal, Jordan A. Sigale, Law Offices of Dick & Harris, Chicago, IL, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONLON, District Judge.

C.R. Bard, Inc. ("Bard") sues M3 Systems, Inc. ("M3 Systems") for patent infringement. M3 Systems counterclaims for inequitable conduct and violations of the Sherman Act. After the parties filed a joint pretrial order, the court severed the trial into four distinct stages (i.e., a "quadrifurcated" trial). M3 Systems now seeks leave to file additional motions in limine.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases