1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 886 F.Supp.
  5. 886 F.Supp. 331 (1994)
 

EJS v. AMERICAN TEL. & TEL. CO.

No. 92 Civ. 3038 (SS).

886 F.Supp. 331 (1994)

EJS-ASOC TICARET VE DANISMANLIK LTD. STI., Edward J. Stackpole, and Itir Stackpole, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY and Unsworth Transport International, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 7, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis H. Cavanaugh, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Nathan & Brecher, New York City (David J. Nathan, of counsel), American Tel. & Tel. Co. Legal Dept., New York City (George D. Zuckerman, Sr. Atty., of counsel), for defendant American Tel. & Tel. Co.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.

Defendant American Telephone and Telegraph ("AT & T") moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rule 56"). For the reasons discussed below, the motion for summary judgment is granted.

Background

The facts in this case have been fully set forth in an Opinion and Order dated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases