1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 883 F.Supp.
  5. 883 F.Supp. 321 (1994)
 

BOB NICHOLSON APPLIANCE, INC. v. MAYTAG CO.

No. NA 91-131 C.

883 F.Supp. 321 (1994)

BOB NICHOLSON APPLIANCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. MAYTAG COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division.

September 15, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Fifer, Mark B. Geller, New Albany, IN, for plaintiff.

David W. Crumbo, Mary Ann Guenther, New Albany, IN, Kenneth J. Tuggle, Brown Todd & Heyburn, Louisville, KY, for defendant.

ENTRY

BARKER, Chief Judge.

The Maytag Company ("Maytag") moves for summary judgment on Bob Nicholson Appliance, Inc.'s ("BNA") Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated below, we grant Maytag's motion for summary judgment as to all counts.

I. BACKGROUND

BNA, an Indiana corporation, sells home appliances at retail in New Albany, Indiana. Maytag, a Delaware corporation, manufactures and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases