1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 862 F.Supp.
  5. 862 F.Supp. 342 (1994)
 

BROOKS v. STATE OF OKL.

No. CIV-93-1679-A.

862 F.Supp. 342 (1994)

Virgil BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

As Corrected September 14, 1994 by Order Nunc Pro Tunc.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Virgil Brooks, pro se.

Wellon B. Poe, Jr., Office of the Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, OK and Louis W. Bullock, Bullock & Bullock, Tulsa, OK, for defendants.

ORDER

ALLEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Objection to Supplemental Report and Recommendation filed by plaintiff, Virgil Brooks, in response to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Doyle Argo. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Argo for preliminary review. On April 28, 1994, Magistrate Judge Argo recommended that the defendant's motion to dismiss be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases