1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 858 F.Supp.
  5. 858 F.Supp. 337 (1994)
 

LEICHING v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.

No. 92-CV-1170.

858 F.Supp. 337 (1994)

Corey LEICHING, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. MIRON BUILDING PRODUCTS CO., Big V Supermarkets, Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

July 13, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ianniello, Anderson Law Firm, Clifford Park, NY, Chris N. Luhn, of counsel, for plaintiff.

McNamee, Lochner Law Firm, Albany, NY, Paul E. Scanlon, of counsel, for defendant Conrail.

Thuillez, Ford Law Firm, Albany, NY, Donald P. Ford, Jr., of counsel, for defendants Miron and Big V.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

Defendant and third party plaintiff Conrail has moved, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), for reconsideration of an Order of this court dated March 19, 1994, which granted summary judgment in favor of third party defendants Miron Building Products and Big V Supermarkets. In the alternative, Conrail has requested leave to reargue the summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases