1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 32 F.3d
  5. 32 F.3d 1151 (1994)
 

U.S. v. $40,877.59 IN U.S. CURRENCY

No. 93-2401.

32 F.3d 1151 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $40,877.59 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendant, Anas Malik Dohan, Claimant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 17, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donna Eide (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty., Indianapolis, IN, for plaintiff-appellee.

Michael Vatis, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Washington, DC, for defendant.

Michael Vatis, Alan E. Untereiner (argued), Michael R. Bromwich, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Washington, DC, for appellant.

Before CUMMINGS and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges, and ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.

ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a default judgment entered by the district court for the Southern District of Indiana. The district court applied the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to bar the claimant-appellant from contesting the forfeiture of the defendant funds. In this action, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981, we are called upon to decide whether that doctrine should be expanded to apply to civil forfeitures to bar fugitive-claimants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases