1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 868 F.Supp.
  5. 868 F.Supp. 284 (1994)
 

STEINER v. HALE

No. CV 93-1416 H (CM).

868 F.Supp. 284 (1994)

Jeffrey J. STEINER, Plaintiff, v. David F. HALE, Carl F. Bobkowski, James C. Blair, Paul K. Laikind, Steven C. Mendell, L. John Wilkerson, Daniel D. Burgess, Thomas P. Donahue, Gensia Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Aramed, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

July 13, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric B. Freedus, John M. Fedor, Frank and Freedus, San Diego, CA, for plaintiff.

Morgan R. Smock, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, CA, for defendants.

ORDER GRANTING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

HUFF, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

On July 11, 1994, the court heard the defendants' motion to dismiss. Cletus Lyman and John Fedor appeared on behalf of the plaintiff, and Walter Robinson and Kirke Hasson appeared on behalf of the defendants. Because the plaintiff has not sufficiently pleaded the alleged deception with particularity, the court grants without prejudice the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases