1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 27 F.3d
  5. 27 F.3d 1120 (1994)
 

MEGENITY v. STENGER

No. 93-5564.

27 F.3d 1120 (1994)

Mark MEGENITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert L. STENGER, Professor of Law, University of Louisville School of Law; Kathleen Bean, Professor of Law, Reinstatement and Probation Committee, University of Louisville School of Law; Gene Teitelbaum, Professor of Law, Reinstatement and Probation Committee, University of Louisville School of Law; Walter Scott Thomson, Professor of Law, Reinstatement and Probation Committee, University of Louisville School of Law; James T.R. Jones, Associate Professor of Law, Reinstatement and Probation Committee, University of Louisville School of Law; Richard H. Nowka, Professor of Law, Chair, Reinstatement and Probation Committee, University of Louisville School of Law, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided June 23, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold G. Wren (argued), Walton Johnson (briefed), Voyles & Johnson, Gary R. Hillerich, Frank E. Haddad, Jr., Louisville, KY, for Mark Megenity.

Holland N. McTyeire (argued and briefed), Barbara Reid Hartung, Greenebaum, Doll & McDonald, Thomas H. Lyons, University Counsel, University of Louisville, Michael R. Engleman, Louisville Gas & Elec. Co., Louisville, KY, for Robert L. Stenger, Kathleen Bean, Gene Teitelbaum, Walter Scott Thomson, James T.R. Jones, Richard N. Nowka.

Before: MILBURN and GUY, Circuit Judges; and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

GUY, Circuit Judge, delivered the opinion of the court, in which MILBURN, Circuit Judge, joined.

BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge (p. 1125), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the result.

RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, Mark Megenity, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendants. Megenity had administratively appealed his dismissal for academic reasons from the University of Louisville School of Law. When his appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases