1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 883 P.2d
  5. 883 P.2d 255 (1994)
 

GTE NORTHWEST v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N

93-852; CA A81647.

883 P.2d 255 (1994)

130 Or. App. 637

GTE NORTHWEST, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON, Respondent, and MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Intervenor-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 19, 1994.

Review Allowed December 20, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Potter, Everett, WA, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Timothy J. O'Connell, Everett, WA, James M. Brown and Enfield, Guimond, Brown & Collins, Salem.

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Keith L. Kutler, Asst. Atty. Gen.

No appearance for intervenor-respondent MCI Telecommunications Corp.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LEESON, JJ.

EDMONDS, Judge.

GTE Northwest, Inc. (GTE), challenges, under ORS 183.400, certain rules of the Public Utility Commission (PUC), adopted by Order No. 93-852,1 requiring local telephone exchange companies (LECs) to offer "collocation" to enhanced service providers (ESPs) located in their areas. We hold that the rules are valid.

The order in question adopted a regulatory framework known as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases