1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 884 S.W.2d
  5. 884 S.W.2d 231 (1994)
 

KING v. HOLLAND

No. 13-93-309-CV.

884 S.W.2d 231 (1994)

Delcer KING and Wife, Renda King, Appellants, v. David C. HOLLAND and David C. Holland & Company, P.C., d/b/a Holland & Stephenson, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

Rehearing Overruled October 6, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony F. Constant, Corpus Christi, David A. Smith, Hartman, Lapham & Smith, Victoria, for appellants.

David W. Corban, Fulbright & Jaworski, Houston, W. Wendell Hall, Renee A. Forinash, Fulbright & Jaworski, San Antonio, for appellees.

Before KENNEDY, GILBERTO HINOJOSA and YANEZ, JJ.

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

We withdraw our opinion of August 18, 1994 and enter this opinion in its place. Delcer and Renda King sued David C. Holland and David C. Holland & Company, P.C., d/b/a Holland & Stephenson for legal malpractice. The court granted Holland's motion for summary judgment based on statute of limitations against most of the Kings' claims detailed below. The court then dismissed the case for want of prosecution. We affirm in part...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases