1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 525 N.W.2d
  5. 525 N.W.2d 589 (1994)
 

LARSON v. BABCOCK & WILCOX

No. CX-94-1599.

525 N.W.2d 589 (1994)

Kent LARSON, et al., Appellants, v. BABCOCK & WILCOX, Respondent, Detroit Stoker Company, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 27, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack G. Marcil, LaDonne R. Vik, Serkland, Lundberg, Erickson, Marcil & McLean, Ltd., Fargo, ND, for appellants.

Timothy J. McLarnan, James E. Nicolai, Gjevre, McLarnan, Hannaher, Vaa, Skatvold & McLarnan, Moorhead, for Babcock & Wilcox.

Steven J. Muth, Leo I. Brisbois, Stich, Angell, Kreidler & Muth, Minneapolis, for Detroit Stoker Co.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and RANDALL and SCHUMACHER, JJ.

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellants Kent Larson, Clifford Nelson, and Hugh Stadem challenge the summary judgment, arguing the district court erroneously determined that Minn.Stat. § 541.051 operates to bar their claim against respondents Detroit Stoker Company and Babcock & Wilcox. Larson, Nelson, and Stadem contend their claim is within a 1990 amendment to the statute that allows claims against suppliers of machinery or equipment. We affirm....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases