STATE v. MUNIZ

No. 93-2147-CR.

181 Wis.2d 928 (1994)

512 N.W.2d 252

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mauro MUNIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided January 25, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of Paul M. Cornett of Little Chute.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of John F. Truby of Appleton.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.


MYSE, J.

Mauro Muniz appeals a trial court judgment convicting him of operating after revocation (OAR), second offense, in violation of § 343.44(1), STATS., and imposing criminal penalties under § 343.44(2)(b)1. Muniz contends that the trial court erred by imposing criminal penalties under § 343.44(2)(b)1 because the only suspension in effect at the time of the current violation was imposed for failure to pay a forfeiture. Because we conclude that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases