1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 850 F.Supp.
  5. 850 F.Supp. 255 (1994)
 

HERTZOG, CALAMARI & GLEASON v. PRUDENTIAL INS.

No. 93 Civ. 6395 (CSH).

850 F.Supp. 255 (1994)

HERTZOG, CALAMARI & GLEASON, Plaintiff, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 8, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Simon, Hertzog, Calamari & Gleason, New York City, for plaintiff.

H. Richard Penn, Bachner, Tally, Polevoy & Misher, New York City, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

Defendant's motion to compel discovery is denied.

Under the law of this circuit a partnership, like a corporation, cannot appear pro se. It must appear through an attorney admitted to practice. Eagle Associates v. Bank of Montreal, 926 F.2d 1305 (2d Cir. 1991).

A corporation may appear through retained outside counsel or by in-house counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases