SHERMAN v. MARDEN

No. C1-94-1037.

525 N.W.2d 550 (1994)

Bonita Kay SHERMAN, et al., Appellants, v. John MARDEN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 20, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie A. Gelhar, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Steven L. Viltoft, Labore & Giuliani, Hopkins, for respondent.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and HARTEN, and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.

Appellant alleges that the trial court erred in allowing inadmissible hearsay testimony of an expert witness and that the trial judge's absence from the courtroom during presentation of videotaped deposition testimony constituted a prejudicial irregularity in the proceedings. We affirm.

FACTS

Passenger Bonita Sherman sustained soft tissue neck injury during...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases