1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 852 F.Supp.
  5. 852 F.Supp. 221 (1994)
 

AT & T CO. v. UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORP.

No. 90 Civ. 3881 (PKL).

852 F.Supp. 221 (1994)

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists Telecommunications, Inc., Ranlee Communications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture and UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 12, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kleinberg, Kaplan, Wolff & Cohen, P.C., New York City (David Parker, Monica L. Kaiser, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, New York City (Robert M. Peak, Jeffrey N. Leibell, of counsel), for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge.

The defendants in this action (collectively, "United Artists") seek summary judgment on defendants' claim for attorney's fees. Plaintiff ("AT & T") moves to dismiss the claim for attorney's fees pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1),1 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases