McLEE v. CHRYSLER CORP.

Nos. 94-8014, 94-3082.

38 F.3d 67 (1994)

William J. McLEE, Plaintiff, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Movant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided October 12, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Sussman, Goshen, NY, for plaintiff.

Louis Ginsberg, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, New York City, for defendant-movant.

Before NEWMAN, Chief Judge, KEARSE and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges.


JON O. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Pending before us is a motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus directed to a District Judge considering an employment discrimination case. The circumstances giving rise to the motion are as follows:

The defendant, Chrysler Corporation, moved for summary judgment in the District Court. Judge Goettel denied the motion, but, in doing so, made clear that he was under the impression that this Court had precluded grants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases