1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 859 F.Supp.
  5. 859 F.Supp. 180 (1994)
 

LUTZ APPELLATE SERVICES, INC. v. CURRY

Civ. A. No. 94-3985.

859 F.Supp. 180 (1994)

LUTZ APPELLATE SERVICES, INC. v. Rodney CURRY and Douglas Taylor, Individually and t/a Curry & Taylor.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

July 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie Weisse, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.

Craig B. Sobel, Philadelphia, PA, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

BARTLE, District Judge.

As new technology emerges, the appearance of related legal issues seems never to be far behind. This is such a case. It concerns the prohibitions on the use of the now ubiquitous facsimile ("fax") machine under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. § 227.

Plaintiff, Lutz Appellate Services, Inc., filed the present action against a former employee, Rodney Curry, and his business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases