1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 856 F.Supp.
  5. 856 F.Supp. 168 (1994)
 

I.R.V. MERCHANDISING v. JAY WARD PRODUCTIONS

No. 93 Civ. 6143 (CHT).

856 F.Supp. 168 (1994)

I.R.V. MERCHANDISING CORP., Plaintiff, v. JAY WARD PRODUCTIONS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 24, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Miskin, Ursula Day, Stoll, Miskin, Previto & Hoffman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Roger Zissu, Weiss Dawid Fross Zelnick & Lehrman, New York City, Ronald Rosen, Troy & Gould, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant.

ORDER AND OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff I.R.V. Merchandising Corp. ("I.R.V.") brings this diversity action against defendant Jay Ward Productions, Inc., alleging breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage. Defendant moves for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b). The court finds that disputed questions of material fact exist, and the motion is denied in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases