NBZ, INC. v. PILARSKI

No. 93-2219.

185 Wis.2d 827 (1994)

520 N.W.2d 93

NBZ, INC., d/b/a Studio 890, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paula PILARSKI, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 8, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of George N. Kotsonis of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Arnold P. Anderson of Mohr, Anderson & McClurg, S.C. of Hartford.

Before Brown, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ.


BROWN, J.

The issues in this case arise from a covenant not to compete executed between NBZ, Inc., doing business as Studio 890—a hairstyling concern—and Paula Pilarski, a former Studio 890 employee. The first issue is whether restrictive covenants in employment contracts, subject to the requirements of §103.465, STATS., are also subject to common law contract principles requiring that a contract be supported by consideration. We hold that covenants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases